RCG
No Treaty
Sept 1st, 2009 : Royal Inquisition : Criminal Military Court
Trial between Crown of Europe versus Crown of Turtle Island North
Duncan, British Columbia, Provincial Courthouse
Addressed To
The United Nations General Assembly, Secretary General, Security Council, Human Rights Commissioner; and, the International Court Of Justice
A Public Declaration Of Good And Just Cause
Let us first understand who are the
Combatants; then, let us hear of the
Charges and
Explanations; and, then, to receive the
Rules Of Court for the fundamental basis of these charges under the
Canada Criminal Code:
Part VIII:
Offences Against Person And Reputation : Sec.264.1.1.b:
Assaults : Uttering threats : 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property.
The Combatants: The Crowns : England versus North America : Tribalism
(A) The Crown Of England and Assignee Canada : specifically :
The Charges
Canada Criminal Code: Part VIII: Offences Against Person And Reputation : Sec.264.1.1.b: Assaults : Uttering threats : 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property
(A) No clarification has been provided by the Crown to indicate the source or habeas corpus; i.e. what was said or done to cause a perceived threat
(B) No identity of the Accusers has been provided; and, an unreasonable universal contact prohibition has been executed against the Accused,
which prohibits the contact with any party of two regional governments and one INAC 642 office
(C) The Accused, in previous communications with Canada's RCMP Commissioner and local detachment, had petitioned for a document of rightful
Crown claim of jurisdiction of territory to be provided due to the absence of any government-to-government Treaty. None has been provided
(D) Quamichan Village at Coast Salish Peoples Quw'utsun remains today as a self-governing body, not vanquished by Elizabeth II or her Assignee
Canada
Explanations
(A) The Accused Goodwin possesses documents from the Office of the Prime Minister Of Canada which establishes that JUB has continued its
operations since 1960 outside of the claimed regulatory authority of Canada - we are advised to seek independent legal advice on the matter of
compensation
(B) Further, Goodwin as the chosen contractor by the three known and credible landholders, is required to comply with applicable law while
progressing to simultaneouly decommission this JUB facility; and, install a closed-loop treatment plant without interfering with the public access
to the services of sewage disposal
(C) Expert legal advice has opined that the proposed 1996-98 JUB document with the CP Holders is merely a Memorandum of Understanding; not
enforceable
(D) Federal Department of Justice documents of 2007 have established that due to JUB's non-compliance with environmental laws, there shall not
be a Lease issued to JUB under the Canada INAC policies
(E) Even in view of these factors, British Columbia has refused to cancel its issued Environmental discharge Permit to JUB; wherein continues to
discharge settled sewage waters into the heritage Cowichan River without adequately removing chemical hazards that cause known demise of
male fish in this salmon river - and, which now are also known to be the source of the lower incidence of male human births around the world
(F) Goodwin has adequately informed JUB of his obligation to decommission this JUB facility- at their expense- and, install the more comprehensive
closed-loop SVS-IHHI project through private funding sources
(H) There is no evident complaint filed to Goodwin's attention by JUB and its legal counsel [or, through DOJ Crown Counsel]. And, further, there is no
evident instruction from Canada to INAC 642 to participate in this charge against Gaia-Watt's president Goodwin on July 21st, 2009 : Court date
September 1st, 2009 at Duncan Provincial Court
This civil contract issue is one of a dispute between two Parties simultaneously claiming governing jurisdiction of a large tract of traditional lands. Both Parties claim a right in law to possession of this territory where the JUB open sewage lagoon facility has existed since 1960.
The Elizabeth II Crown Canada [E2CC] claim originates through a series of declarations - without war - of territorial right through the Terra Nullius Papal Bulls. This claim is supported by documents of incorporation through the Hudson's Bay Company and the records of Prince Rupert of Germany.
The Coast Salish Original Peoples of Turtle Island North [CSOPTIN] claim a continuous occupancy and governance of these lands that stretch from British Columbia to Oregon through 10,000 years of traversing these waters and lands; and, which was interrupted by private corporate merchant ships from Europe circa 1778.
Quw'utsun Peoples (2) were known for their fierce determination to protect their lands. Families in this Quw'utsun valley travelled from here to the interior regions near Hells Gate; to south into Oregon
Therefore, two states claiming existing and paramount nationhood status are embroiled in a political claim of land and resources at these JUB open sewage lagoons. And, therein, the Accused Goodwin is the lawspeaker on behalf of the Original Peoples Clients who possess these lands by custom and tradition; re-enforced by the Elizabeth II-Canada claim through the Indian Act that establishes Certificates of Possession [not recognized by these Original Peoples].
JUB, INAC 642, City of Duncan and, the District of North Cowichan are inferior bodies to the paramount federal Elizabeth II-Canada Governor In Council. CSOPTIN is superior to E2CC. The right of claim of eminent domain and any issue of posse comutatis rests within the authority of Quamichan Village as a sovereign state nation.
The Rules of Engagement are those as established by CSOPTIN.
In conclusion, there being a contest between two nations [CSOPTIN and E2CC] concerning the prevailing right of regulation, with no existing Treaty; and,
(A) The para-military RCMP invading the sovereign CSOPTIN Quw'utsun Quamichan Village to arrest Goodwin under the Criminal Code of Canada
regarding the environmental integrity of this JUB facility for the good of the whole creates an international incident of hostile invasion for the
purpose of establishing a claim to land and resources by E2CC contrary to international law and in contravention of Canada's obligations under
the UN Charter
(B) Goodwin is seized into arrest by military force; and, therefore, any court of competent jurisdiction must be formed through the international
(C) There is no right of claim in this contested territory for the Canada Criminal Code or any other Canada statute
(D) Any court entering these CSOPTIN territories without specific invitation by the traditional Leaders [with community support] of Quamichan Village
shall be subject to arrest and detention by Quamichan Peoples Law Enforcement; and, therein, turned over to the UN Emergency Forces
Provost Marshal for prosecution
(E) Goodwin has filed complaint information against the legal counsels for JUB and INAC 642 regarding an assertion of vindictive, capricious, and
malicious abuse of process for the evident sole purpose of impairing Goodwin's good public reputation; therein, creating a public image of
Goodwin being a criminal businessman / banker, lawspeaker, environmentalist, futurist
(F) Goodwin has filed a Response to the attention of the Crown Counsel to withdraw these unfounded criminal charges forthwith, There has not been
any subsequent reply by Crown Counsel.
In Truth, Ralph Charles Goodwin / Yuxwuletun
5795 Church Road, Duncan, BC, Canada V9L 5M3 / Turtle Island North
Salus Populi Suprema Est Lex : the Right of the People Is The First Law
- 30 -
copyrighted:TC75:2009
and Search 